Aaron Judge Responds to Tying Alex Rodriguez on Yankees All-Time Home Run List

Aaron Judge joined some elite company on Sunday.

The reigning American League MVP blasted his 36th home run of the season in the New York Yankees' 4–2 win over the Atlanta Braves. That long ball gave him 351 in his career, which tied him with Alex Rodriguez for sixth place on the franchise's all-time list.

After the game, the Judge addressed what it felt like to match Rodriguez.

"Just an incredible honor," the seven-time All-Star said. "Especially growing up watching A-Rod for so many years and watching him do what he did with pinstripes. He's a legend, one of the best to ever play."

Rodriguez played with the Yankees from 2004 through the '16 season. He sat out the 2014 campaign as a result of his connection to the Biogenesis performance-enhancing drugs scandal. He helped lead New York to a World Series title in '09.

Next on the list for Judge will be Yogi Berra at 358 home runs. The only players higher on the franchise's all-time list are Babe Ruth (659), Mickey Mantle (536), Lou Gehrig (493) and Joe DiMaggio (361).

At his current pace, he will almost certainly be in fourth place by the end of the season.

How Close Cal Raleigh Came to Winning First AL MVP Award Over Aaron Judge

In the most anticipated award race of the 2025 season, Mariners catcher Cal Raleigh finished second in voting for the 2025 American League MVP award Thursday, falling to Yankees slugger Aaron Judge.

Raleigh's historic season for the Mariners, which helped the club reach Game 7 of the ALCS, wasn’t enough to earn him the prestigious award over Judge, who took home his second straight AL MVP and the third of his career.

It was a close race, too.

Of the 30 ballots submitted by the BBWAA, Judge received 17 votes for first place—barely eking out Raleigh, who took home 13 first-place votes. It was the closest vote for MVP in either league since Angels star Mike Trout received 17 first-place votes to win the 2019 AL MVP over Astros slugger Alex Bregman (13 votes).

Here’s a closer look at the voting for the top-five 2025 AL MVP finishers:

2025 AL MVP voting—full results (top five)

PLAYER

1ST PLACE

2ND PLACE

3RD PLACE

TOTAL POINTS

Aaron Judge, Yankees

17

13

0

355

Cal Raleigh, Mariners

13

17

0

335

José Ramírez, Guardians

0

0

19

224

Bobby Witt Jr., Royals

0

0

9

215

Tarik Skubal, Tigers

0

0

1

139

RELATED: Every MLB Player Who Received Exactly One MVP Vote

Raleigh led the American League with 60 home runs and 125 RBIs; he also scored 110 runs on the season for Seattle. No catcher in MLB history has hit more homers in a single season than Raleigh, but Judge’s otherworldly bWAR (9.7) and OPS (1.144) was too much for Raleigh to overcome in the eyes of the voters.

Raleigh would have become just the 13th catcher in MLB history to win an MVP award, and the first since Buster Posey captured the title for the San Francisco Giants in 2012.

Full list of MLB catchers to win MVP

PLAYER

TEAM

YEAR

bWAR

Buster Posey

Giants

2012

7.6

Joe Mauer

Twins

2009

7.6

Ivan Rodriguez

Rangers

1999

6.1

Thurman Munson

Yankees

1976

5.0

Johnny Bench

Reds

1972

8.5

Johnny Bench

Reds

1970

7.1

Elston Howard

Yankees

1963

5.0

Roy Campanella

Dodgers

1955

5.0

Yogi Berra

Yankees

1955

4.2

Yogi Berra

Yankees

1954

5.0

Roy Campanella

Dodgers

1953

6.8

Roy Campanella

Dodgers

1951

6.3

Yogi Berra

Yankees

1951

4.5

Ernie Lombardi

Reds

1938

5.3

Gabby Hartnett

Cubs

1935

4.8

Mickey Cochrane

Tigers

1934

3.7

Mickey Cochrane

Athletics

1928

3.4

Bob O’Farrell

Cardinals

1926

3.4

Mets Hit So Many Home Runs vs. Braves They Ran Out of Fireworks at Citi Field

The Mets ended their losing streak in fashion on Tuesday night, beating the Braves 13–5. New York came into the game having lost 11 of their last 12 and broke out with six home runs, including two from Pete Alonso as he became the franchise's all-time leader in the category.

The Mets hit so many home runs that the crew at Citi Field didn't have enough fireworks to celebrate them all properly. By the time Brett Baty hit the team's sixth homer of the game to tie the franchise record for home runs in a home game, the Home Run Apple appeared too tired to rise.

If only Baty had waited a couple pitches so the apple could catch its breath. Things got so bad that Citi Field had to put an announcement on the scoreboard apologizing for running out of fireworks.

In addition to Alonso and Baty, Francisco Alvarez added two of his own and Brandon Nimmo hit the other home run.

The Mets record for home runs in a game remains eight.

Dave Roberts Reveals Dodgers' Pitching Plans for NLCS vs. Brewers

The Dodgers are gearing up for their second consecutive NLCS appearance in hopes of defending their 2024 World Series title. After disposing of the Phillies in four games in the Division Series, Los Angeles will now set its sights on the Brewers, with Game 1 of the best-of-seven series slated for Monday night.

On Sunday night, Dave Roberts spoke to reporters and detailed what the Dodgers' pitching plans for the upcoming series would be, via Fabian Ardaya of . Roberts indicated that the team intends for starters Blake Snell and Yoshinobu Yamamoto to each start two games of the series and that Shohei Ohtani is also set to pitch "at some point," though he didn't specify when.

Snell is scheduled to start Game 1, and Roberts said the Dodgers would turn to Yamamoto in Game 2.

Tyler Glasnow also figures to start at least a game in the series, though he also pitched in relief earlier this postseason and had plenty of success doing so. It's possible he'll start Game 3 and Ohtani would then go in Game 4.

As for the Brewers, they've yet to name a Game 1 starter, though Freddy Peralta is in line to start in Game 2 against Yamamoto.

First pitch for Game 1 is scheduled for 8:08 p.m. ET from American Family Field in Milwaukee on Monday.

Who makes it to our Kings XI Punjab all-time XI?

The franchise’s squad changes mirror their fluctuating fortunes, which means some legends miss out

Gaurav Sundararaman and Saurabh Somani02-May-2020ESPNcricinfo Ltd

Kings XI Punjab

Kings XI Punjab have shown promise in many seasons but have not been able to deliver during the crunch moments. In some seasons, they were in a good position to make the play-offs but failed to do so. It was not easy to pick an all-time XI for a franchise that has constantly chopped and changed its sides, with five different coaches in the last five seasons and inconsistency in team selection over the years.ALSO READ: ESPNcricinfo’s all-time Delhi Capitals XIThe picks
There were not too many overseas performers who have stood out for Kings XI over the 12 seasons. Shaun Marsh, David Miller and Glenn Maxwell made the cut for various impactful performances they had whenever the team won and are the top three run-getters for Kings XI. KL Rahul was another no-brainer, with his scintillating performances in the last two seasons. Wridhhiman Saha’s 2014 season was good enough for him to make the the side. Among the bowlers, the spin duo of Axar Patel and Piyush Chawla also walked in due to their consistent performances.The debate
While three overseas spots were sealed, the fourth spot had a few contenders. Adam Gilchrist, Ryan Harris, Andrew Tye and Mitchell Johnson all had various memorable moments. However, none of these bowlers really had the impact that Gilchrist had for Kings XI at the top. He is also a natural captaincy candidate, even though his inclusion means Saha might have to patrol the outfield. With many Indian bowlers putting up good performances, we felt the fourth overseas spot could go to a batsman rather than a bowler. The bowlers threw up some interesting discussions. Domestic bowlers dominated the pacers. Irfan Pathan, Sandeep Sharma, Parvinder Awana, Praveen Kumar and Mohit Sharma were vying for three slots. Irfan had 47 wickets at 7.79 and an impressive strike rate of 19.1. The fact that he can bat gave him an edge over the others. Praveen Kumar, although not high up among the wickets, got a boost due to his ability to strike early and bowl tight (his economy rate for Kings XI is 6.96) and was chosen ahead of Mohit Sharma. The last bowling spot went to Sandeep Sharma, an outstanding powerplay and death bowler, and the leading wicket-taker among pacers for Kings XI with 71 wickets. He has dismissed Virat Kohli six times, Chris Gayle four times and David Warner thrice. Sandeep walks in purely for setting up games for Kings XI with the ball.ALSO READ: ESPNcricinfo’s all-time Chennai Super Kings XIVirender Sehwag and Yuvraj Singh were others options discussed but with the top order dominated by overseas players, and the duo’s performances for the team being patchy, there was no place for these two legends. This gives the team six batsmen with two bowling allrounders. There are five frontline bowlers plus some part time offspin by Maxwell.

Playing XI stats for KXIP

1. Shaun Marsh
71 matches (2008-2017)
Runs 2477, Ave 39.95, SR 132.742. Adam Gilchrist (capt and wk)

34 matches (2011-2013)
Runs 849, Ave 27.38, SR 127.28
26 ct, 3 stumpings3. KL Rahul

28 matches (2018-2019)
Runs 1252, Ave 54.43, SR 146.604. Glenn Maxwell

57 matches (2014-17)
Runs 1275, Ave 25.00, SR 165.365. David Miller

82 matches (2012-19)
Runs 1974, Ave 35.35, SR 139.406. Wriddhiman Saha

54 matches (2014-17)
Runs 1190, Ave 24.79, SR 130.487. Axar Patel
72 matches (2014-18)
Wkts 69, Ave 27.36, ER 7.418. Irfan Pathan
42 matches (2008-2010)
Wkts 47, Ave 24.80, ER 7.799. Piyush Chawla
87 matches (2008-2013)
Wkts 84, Ave 26.63, ER 7.5210. Praveen Kumar
44 matches (2011-2013)
Wkts 31, Ave 37.16, ER 6.9611. Sandeep Sharma

56 matches (2013-2017)
Wkts 71, Ave 22.35, ER 7.77

All-time IPL XIs,

What is the template for a successful chase in the IPL?

A look at how teams successfully get to targets in the tournament and what they do at each stage of a game

Himanish Ganjoo31-Aug-2020Limited-overs cricket divides the game into two halves: batting first and chasing are markedly different from each other. With a target in sight, batting sides approach their innings considering what they need to achieve. Compared to the uncertainty involved in setting a good target, this largely makes chasing a better strategy, which is why teams winning the toss have chosen to field first in 77.6% of completed matches in the IPL since 2015. When they opt to chase, teams win 57.5% of matches. On the other hand, even when they lose the toss and are asked to chase, they win 52.5% of the time. Teams have identified that chasing presents a clear advantage. But what does the average chasing side do right? How is the standard chasing win constructed in the IPL?In this article, we will analyse chases of 140 or more in the last five IPL seasons, to restrict our data to reasonably challenging targets in the recent past.Looking at the chances of winning a chase, a total of between 140 and 160, which would be considered slightly under par on an average T20 wicket, presents a 61.1% chance of being chased down; 177 is the average target for teams in this dataset, and that falls at the end of the 160-180 bracket, which is a traditional “par” score and corresponds to a roughly 57% and 44% success rate.

To break up how winning sides construct their chases, let us first look at the powerplay. The median winning team achieves 31.07% of its target by the end of the powerplay, for the loss of one wicket. The median losing side, in contrast, gets to just over 26% of the target at that stage, while losing two wickets. Remarkably, the average percentage of target scored in the powerplay is mostly consistent for winning sides, across target ranges.

The average winning sides score a tad more than 30% of the target in the powerplay, which makes up 30% of the allotted overs. In addition, the median number of wickets lost is one, across all target ranges. Typical winning teams follow the consistent strategy of staying just abreast of the required rate while conserving wickets.Losing sides, on the other hand, make less and less of the target as it goes higher, and lose a median of two wickets in the powerplay. They fall behind the curve even in the first segment of the innings.

The number of wickets that fall in the powerplay is well correlated with chances of winning a chase. As the following table shows, each additional wicket down at six overs brings the win probability down by huge margins. No doubt, this is correlated with low run rates that come about due to the loss of wickets.

However, if a side makes more than 30% of the target in the powerplay, staying close to the required run rate, there’s no clear trend saying more wickets lost leads to a lower win probability.

Bowling philosophies in the powerplay are varied. Batsmen are most conservative at the start of the innings, and some teams try to sneak in a few “quiet” overs to retain more attacking options for later. The above data suggests that bowling teams should look to attack more and take wickets early on, deflating the innings before the batsmen start to cut loose to utilise the field restrictions towards the end of the powerplay overs.The seventh over, when batting teams are waking up to the second epoch of their innings, should be the designated slot for getting through a part-timer’s over. The Melbourne Renegades have employed Tom Cooper to this end.Tom Moody, on a recent episode of the Pitch Side Experts Podcast, agreed about attacking bowling early in the piece: “In the first six overs… the value of wickets outweighs the fact that you may go for a few boundaries, so I’d much rather focus on setting up the first six overs with an attacking approach, knowing that if I’ve got two or three in the bag after six overs, we’re in a very strong position to control the innings.”On the other hand, the chasing team could employ dispensable pinch-hitters at the top of the order for short, fast knocks that make the most of the first three overs, when both teams are playing circumspectly. This ensures an early lead over the required rate, without the loss of a wicket meaning much. In the UAE, where pitches are more sluggish than in India, making hay while the ball is hardest might prove to be a key strategy.***Minimising the loss of wickets while going at the asking rate till the powerplay ends seems to be the way an average team goes about winning a chase. How does the rest of the innings pan out?The mean percentage of the target scored in wins is more than that in losses at all stages of an innings. The average unsuccessful chasing side is always behind the average successful one in every phase of the innings, and the gap increases as the innings progresses. The average lost chase reaches 90% of the target if the innings lasts 20 overs.The curve for the typical won chase follows the line of equality closely: the percentage of the target scored is almost always hugging the percentage of deliveries taken. This suggests a bare minimum optimal strategy for chases, which has also been suggested by various operations-research studies on cricket: try to go at the required rate, always.

The average number of wickets lost tells the same tale: a normal chase-winning batting order always has more than one wicket extra in hand compared to a losing one. This difference dwindles as the chase approaches the end and wickets in hand lose their relative value, but from overs six to 16, the gap is always more than one wicket.

That the gap closes towards the end of the chase reflects the dispersion of aggression in a typical victorious chasing innings. Batting sides up the ante as the innings draws to a close.The distribution of aggressive intent from a batting side can be seen in the runs it scores in context of the current required rate. Till how late in the innings are batsmen willing to not strike faster than what is needed? The next graph takes the runs scored off a given ball minus the required runs per ball and averages it for each over. In conjunction with the probability of losing wickets in each over, this explains the distribution of batting resources in a normal chasing win.

An average successful chase can be broken into four phases. In the first two overs, batsmen are settling in, gauging the conditions and conserving their wickets, happy to score below the starting required rate. This increases the asking rate, but they then capitalise on the fielding restrictions in the latter half of the powerplay, going at 0.1 to 0.2 runs per ball faster than what is asked for. From the seventh to the 12th over, they again switch to going below the needed rate, cruising while not drifting too far below it. Noticeably, the seventh over is the most conservative – with the lowest chance of losing wickets, and a run rate well beneath what is required.

The intermediate phase increases the required rate, but since fewer risks are taken, it sets a launchpad for the final stretch. The pacing in the middle overs and the gradual rise of the scoring rate means that the required run rate stays manageable till the 13th over begins, after which the batting steps on the pedal.In contrast, the average differential of runs scored and runs needed per ball is negative for all overs in lost matches. This is in addition to the wicket probabilities being higher, again, for all overs.

The average unaccomplished chase keeps drifting farther away from the right course, the sluggish scoring and the loss of wickets feeding each other and deflating the innings cumulatively. Wickets slow the batting down, boosting the required rate, leading to more risks and more wickets.

At the end of the 12th over, the median winning team breaks even with their run-scoring rate compared to the asking rate. At this stage, the median winning team leaves 70 runs to get, with eight wickets hand, while in losses, the median equation is 90 runs needed with seven wickets in hand. Good chasing teams work towards the target throughout the innings, seldom leaving too much work for the end.Nevertheless, can we pinpoint a “par” target to leave for the last eight overs, which gives you a 50-50 chance of knocking the target down?To accomplish this, we will fit our data to a mathematical model that predicts the chances of winning, given how many runs need to be got and how many wickets remain at the end of 12 overs. Our method of choice will be logistic regression, which uses available data to smoothly predict the chances of a binary result (in our case, win or loss). This will tell us how much an average team can leave for the last phase, depending on the number of wickets they have intact, to give themselves an even chance of victory.This figure shows the predictions of the model after accounting for data from chases of greater than 140. The three different lines correspond to situations with zero, two, and four wickets down at the end of the 12th over. If a team has lost no wickets, anything under 90 runs needed will give them a greater than 50% chance of winning. Having 60 runs to win will give them an 80% chance of a win.

The equivalent value for a 50-50 chance if a team is two wickets down at the same stage is about 80 runs, and 70 runs if four wickets have been lost. Notice that this par target decreases by about ten runs for every two wickets lost at this stage of the innings. This quantifies the payoff between conserving wickets and scoring runs in the middle overs: for every wicket you lose, you should be about five runs closer to the target to maintain even odds of success.

Ravindra Jadeja – Chennai's batting Super King

He’s shown the class of Pooran, timing of de Villiers and finishing of Dhoni. All he needs is more time in the middle

Saurabh Somani30-Oct-20203:15

Ian Bishop on Jadeja: ‘He must get more than eight balls to bat’

“I’m not sure he’s missed training since we’ve been here.” – Stephen Fleming, the Chennai Super Kings coach, on Ravindra Jadeja.”I was hitting well in the nets also so I just kept thinking of that, that how I’m hitting in the nets and I was hoping to do it in the match.” – Jadeja after his innings of 31* off 11 balls to win a last-ball thriller against the Kolkata Knight Riders.Hitting the ball well while training while not having missed a single training session in the two months that the Super Kings have been in the UAE is a of balls hit well. IPL 2020 hasn’t gone the way the Super Kings had planned, but it has heralded the arrival of Jadeja the batsman in the shortest format.In the past three years, he had already lifted his Test batting to have numbers specialist batsmen would be happy with, averaging 48.61 over 24 matches. But, in the shortest format, Jadeja’s batting had never reached those heights on any consistent basis. Before this tournament, his IPL batting average (24.08) and strike rate (122.66) were fairly ordinary.This year, those numbers are out of sight. His batting average of 46.40 and strike rate of 171.85 are the best for his team. Better than Ambati Rayudu and Faf du Plessis, faster than Sam Curran and MS Dhoni. Looking at his Smart Stats, the value of his quick scoring is starkly apparent: Jadeja’s Smart Strike is 195.27, the fourth best in the entire league. He’s ahead of Hardik Pandya, and behind only Kieron Pollard, Nicholas Pooran and AB de Villiers. Or put another way, his batting has been as effective as those gents.Jadeja, the batsman, has been among the best finishers in IPL 2020 by almost any measure. In a team beset by batting worries, he’s been an unheralded superstar.”This season he has been fantastic,” Dhoni said after the win against the Knight Riders. “He has been the only person in our team who has taken that job of scoring runs in the last few overs. The good thing is, he’s very balanced at the end. He knows, and believes in the kind of talent that he has, and he has looked to score everywhere. He’s not just using his power, at times he has scored through the point region if the field is up.”I feel he needed somebody else with him throughout the season, then we could have been good. Most of the sides have at least one or two hard-hitters down the order who can capitalise in the last three or four overs.”Jadeja connects with one on the pads•BCCIJadeja has done this despite batting mostly at No. 6 this season. Unlike Pollard, he hasn’t had the luxury of a top order that’s also firing. Unlike Pooran and de Villiers – when not shielded against leg-spin – he hasn’t had the luxury of time in the middle before exploding. Despite that, he’s been in their league.That he’s not had enough time could be one for the Super Kings post-mortem of the season when they sit back to dissect what went wrong. Jadeja has batted 135 balls so far in 11 innings, but been dismissed only five times. He gets to face just over 12 balls per innings on average, while being dismissed once every 27 balls. Scoring at that rate, and getting out as infrequently, should lead to a promotion in the batting order so that the team can maximise his utility, but that hasn’t happened.The Super Kings did act on the inherent logic of this, which is why Curran earned promotions. But perhaps they missed a trick by not promoting Jadeja too. Dhoni, for example, has been batting ahead of Jadeja in almost every game, and there is a vast gulf in their numbers.Jadeja came in at No.7 in the Super Kings’ first defeat against the Knight Riders, with 39 to get in 2.5 overs. He ended up hitting 21* off eight balls.In the Super Kings’ second match against the Delhi Capitals, he was at No.6, and walked in 3.3 overs remaining in the first innings. He hit 33* off 13 in a match the Capitals won off the penultimate ball.Even on Thursday, by the time Jadeja walked in, only 2.4 overs remained and the Super Kings needed 33 to win. “I think it was game where the climax went in our favour,” Dhoni would smile and say after the match. But could more than one have gone in their favour by utilising their resources – in this case a batsman in prime form – better?There is something to be said for keeping a player back and sending him in when there is limited time left in the game because of how individuals work. You can bat with a free mind, and be at your most effective perhaps when you know there is only one way to play. That certainly has been true of Dinesh Karthik, for example, who has averaged 50.5 at 183.6 when coming in after the 15th over against 18.88 at 127.8 when coming in before the 15th over since IPL 2019.”The last 12 balls you don’t have to think too much, just see the ball and hit the ball,” Jadeja would say after his latest innings. “I knew that if they bowl in my arc I would definitely look to hit a six. That was the simple planning behind it.”Fleming seemed to echo a similar sentiment, almost hinting that too much time in the middle might be counter-productive. “He’s very free,” Fleming said. “At times he’s almost tried to play too smart but now he’s just playing free and seeing the ball and just hitting it beautifully.”On the other hand, in IPL 2020 itself Jadeja has shown he can bat long too. He got the opportunity to do so after top-order collapses. He had 50 off 35 against the Sunrisers Hyderabad and 35* off 30 against the Rajasthan Royals. In a format where batsmen are far more likely to fail than succeed, an effect that is magnified when you bat at No.6, Jadeja’s successes have been remarkable.The Super Kings have only one match left, but even if it won’t affect qualification, it’s worth investing a little more in Jadeja, the batsman.

Unwanted history brings David Warner, Will Pucovski into the frame for Australia

It’s been 32 years since Australia have been pinned down so expertly by tourists, and their captain wants clearer plans from his batsmen

Daniel Brettig29-Dec-2020Last time Australia stumbled through an entire home Test match without a single batsman passing 50, against the mighty West Indies at the MCG in 1988, the aftermath went down as a seminal moment in the minds of many members of what was then a developing team.Allan Border had led his men to the 1987 World Cup and a Test series win over New Zealand at home the following summer, but a defeat in Pakistan followed by three consecutive thumpings from Viv Richards’ Caribbean side caused plenty of hurt and no little frustration in the home dressing room.None of Australia’s batsmen could build on their starts•Getty ImagesNot unlike the top six harried repeatedly into error by India’s seamers in Adelaide and Melbourne 32 years later, Australia’s batsmen were playing without confidence or system, allowing the visitors to dictate terms. To see this pattern reach such a point at the MCG where no one was able to hang around long enough to pass 50, the then team manager Ian MacDonald chose his time to let Border’s team know exactly what he thought, something recounted some years ago by the late Dean Jones.”Macca came from an AFL background and he was filthy at our insipid, gutless performance. He then gave us a coach’s address of which the great Ron Dale Barassi would have been proud,” Jones wrote in in 2016. “Macca yelled out: ‘Enough is enough. We need to start to throw some punches against these blokes as they are killing you. They are making you look like a bunch of weak pricks. Listen to them next door, just bloody listen.Related

  • Wade hopeful of Warner return, Pucovski rejig in opening order

  • The MCG: India's most successful venue away from home

  • Tim Paine queries DRS verdict with umpires

  • Ajinkya Rahane's India wrap up famous Boxing Day victory

  • Ravi Shastri: India's MCG triumph is one of the great comebacks in Test history

‘They are treating you guys like club cricketers. Now we better get together, stick tough and sort out our own issues or this team will be remembered as the worst and most gutless Australian team of all time! Now let’s stick together and start talking how bloody good we are and not how bloody good they are! Let’s draw a line in the sand here as enough is enough!'”Undoubtedly, the dressing room now occupied by Tim Paine’s XI will be feeling similarly low, having failed completely to counter the plans and spells of the Indians, marshalled so expertly by Ajinkya Rahane. They will now be looking eagerly towards the fitness of David Warner, and the recovery from concussion of Will Pucovski, who looms as a potential option either at the top of the order alongside Warner or in the middle.Either way, the opener Joe Burns looks to be on incredibly shaky ground, while the experiment with Matthew Wade has failed to produce the sorts of tempo-building innings that Australia have come to rely upon from Warner. Paine was clear that the hosts needed to find a better balance between attack and defence after India managed to cut down their scoring avenues for the second consecutive Test series.”That’s the game isn’t it, it’s risk/reward, it’s being clear – I think everyone’s going to do it differently,” Paine said. “Matthew Wade looks like he’s going to sweep, some other guys are going to use their feet. Cameron Green didn’t attack overly today but played really nicely.”Everyone’s got to have their own plan, be clear on it and then have the confidence to go out and execute it. We have if anything been slightly tentative in committing to exactly how we want to play the spin or the fast bowling when they’re attacking our stumps and setting really strong leg-side fields.”Paine denied that either Steven Smith or Marnus Labuschagne have been caught out by India’s planning over many long, Covid-19 affected months leading up to this series, even if few can remember seeing Smith’s rotation of the strike so cut back by the posting of two square legs when the pacemen attack the stumps. Instead, he argued that Smith simply needed to get himself established at the crease in one innings to find the metronomic rhythm that has served him so well in the past.

“We have been slightly tentative in committing to exactly how we want to play the spin or the fast bowling when they’re attacking our stumps and setting really strong leg-side fields”Australia captain Tim Paine

“India are bowling well, they’ve been extremely disciplined, we haven’t been able to get partnerships together, but from what I’ve seen watching say Marnus and Steve Smith in their Test career, this is not the first time teams have targeted their stumps. That happens every single Test match,” Paine said.”These guys are executing it better and someone like Steve in particular hasn’t been able to get in yet. Once he does he’ll find a way, as he always has, and the rest of us will follow suit and need to improve, there’s no doubt about that. But these aren’t plans that we’re encountering for the first time.”For Smith, the key is that he has not been able to play a single long innings for all of 2020, leading him to the worst two Test matches of his career in terms of runs scored, usurping Edgbaston and Trent Bridge in 2015 where his rapid dismissals set England on the course to regaining the Ashes. “At the moment I’m searching for time in the middle; that’s the most important thing for me,” Smith told SEN Radio before play.”When I look at this year, 64 balls [66, during the first ODI] is the longest I’ve spent in the middle during those one-day games. For me, that’s important. I find a lot of rhythm out in the middle. You can bat as much as you want in the nets, but there’s nothing that can replicate what a game can do, so that for me is what I’m searching for at the moment. That can be tough to do, particularly in a Test match when you’ve got some quality bowlers.”This of course will also be a challenge for Warner if he is deemed fit to return from a groin strain, while Pucovski will know that his recent concussion history is likely to see him facing plenty of short balls should he be included for a Test match debut in either of the two remaining matches.”David looks really good from what I’ve seen,” Paine said. “He’s been training this week in the nets and started running a bit between the wickets, so I think the early signs with him are very good for the third Test, which is awesome for us, and Will Pucovski a similar boat, I think he’s not far away.”There’s some return-to-play protocol that he has or needs to tick off, I’m not across it all, but my conversations with Will are that he’s pretty close to a return. My conversations with him are that he does feel okay and he’s excited to come back inside the bubble and prepare.”Either way, the Australians have the chance to redeem themselves over two more matches within this series. Border’s men 32 years ago had already lost the series, but went on to win the fourth Test and draw the fifth, an outcome that Paine undoubtedly would take right now.

Shardul Thakur's evolution into India's canny white-ball option

His variety of slower balls and ability to give a good whack with the bat make him a valuable T20 World Cup candidate

Deivarayan Muthu19-Mar-2021In the lead-up to IPL 2018, Chennai Super Kings coach Stephen Fleming was impressed with Shardul Thakur in match-simulation slog overs at Chepauk, although the seamer was bit of a hit-and-miss. Fleming believed that Thakur could become a death-bowling option for the franchise along with the first-choice Dwayne Bravo – if he could work on his lines and lengths. Three years later, Thakur showcased his T20 evolution in a must-win match for India against a power-packed England line-up with an assortment of slower deliveries that might have done Bravo proud.The conditions at Motera on Thursday night were as tough as they could get for any bowler. When Thakur aimed for a yorker at the death with a dew-slicked ball, he lost grip of it so much that it flew behind him. Thakur hadn’t started well either, dropping Dawid Malan on 3 at short third man and then leaking 21 runs from his first two overs. The catch was a tough one, and two boundaries came off edges, but the figures didn’t tell these tales.Related

  • Suryakumar Yadav, bowlers help India make it 2-2

  • Krishna called up for ODI series against England

  • Stand-ins Thakur and Sundar stand out

When Thakur was recalled into the attack, England were in front, needing 46 from 24 balls, in their chase of 186, with six wickets in hand. Ben Stokes had just taken down both Indian spinners Rahul Chahar and Washington Sundar, peeling off 41 from a combined 19 balls off them.ESPNcricinfo’s forecaster pegged England’s chances of winning at 50.62% at the start of the 17th over, but in a space of two balls it nosedived sharply to 15.94%. Thakur rolled out a pair of offcutters and had both Stokes and Eoin Morgan holing out of successive balls. He banged those cutters into the pitch and hid it away from the swinging arcs of both the left-handers. Both batsmen took the wiser option of attempting to hit Thakur straighter as opposed to squarer, but they ended up slicing the ball to the outfielders. With Thakur’s double-strike, India were onto something…Hardik Pandya and Bhuvneshwar Kumar, too, kept taking pace off the ball, bowling legcutters to right-handers and offcutters to left-handers, leaving Thakur with 22 to defend off the last over against Jofra Archer and Chris Jordan. Thakur floated a legcutter away from Jordan’s reach first ball and kept him to an under-edged single. However, against Archer, Thakur veered away from his slower variations wide of off, and served up an on-pace length ball on the stumps that was pumped down the ground for four. The next ball was short and wide with Archer mowing it over midwicket for six. The equation was narrowed to 12 from three balls, and the pressure was back on Thakur. The seamer tossed the ball into his trouser pocket and wiped it furiously.The pressure mounted further on Thakur after he sent down two wides – one for height and the other for width. After a seemingly intense discussion with Rohit Sharma, the stand-in captain, and Pandya, Thakur revisited Plan A: dig slower balls into the pitch and take it away from the batsman. He splintered the toe of Archer’s bat with the fourth legal ball of the over and then had Jordan holing out next delivery with what looked like a knuckle ball to close out the game for India.Shardul Thakur’s double-strike at the death derailed England’s chase•BCCI”The last over [is] never easy and with dew coming in so much…there was not much dew in the last three games, but this game yes there was dew,” Thakur outlined the challenge for him, speaking to . “Definitely a tough over and they [England] were swinging hard. So, they were going for a few runs and it was important to bowl those dot balls – one or two dot balls – and the game was sealed.”Yes definitely because like I mentioned earlier there was dew coming in, so had we bowled the slower ones in the stumps or little bit up then it would have been easy to hit. The idea was to hit into the stumps and keep [the ball] away from their power zone.”Thakur also said that he relished the pressure of bowling the tough overs in the death and powerplay, having also done it recently for CSK in IPL and Mumbai in domestic cricket.”I’m enjoying it a lot,” he said. “Even when I’m playing in the IPL or domestic cricket, I bowl a lot of overs in the death or fourth, fifth or sixth over in the powerplay. So, I bowl a lot of overs where batsmen come hard at bowlers. Kind of getting used to it now.”The Thakur of the old, however, wasn’t used to white-ball cricket. He had fairly limited exposure with the white ball, having played a bulk of his age-group cricket in Mumbai with the red ball. Then, in senior cricket, he first broke into India’s Test squad in 2016 with his strong Ranji Trophy performances. He has since learnt on the job, adding more tricks to his repertoire and knowing when to use them.When Thakur made his T20I debut in 2018, he only seemed to have the knuckle ball as his change-up option. He can now bowl a split-finger variation, cutters into the middle of the pitch, and a cross-seamer that he gets to swerve by imparting backspin. In the ongoing T20I series against England on the grippy Ahmedabad tracks, he has taken all his five wickets with the offcutter, according to ESPNcricinfo’s ball-by-ball data, giving up 65 runs off 43 balls. And he bowled 21 of those offcutters on Thursday alone.India’s attack, much like their batting line-up, is packed with options in the approach to T20 World Cup, but not too many have the adaptability and variety of Thakur. Plus, he can give it a good whack with the bat in the lower order.

A final chance to push for Australia's T20 World Cup squad

A recap of some of those needing to impress the selectors over the five matches against Bangladesh

Andrew McGlashan03-Aug-2021Josh Philippe
It’s still early days for Philippe, but after passing 40 twice in his first three innings against New Zealand earlier this year, it has been more of a struggle with scores of 13, 2, 1, 13 and 0. In the West Indies, he battled to adapt to the slower surfaces compared to how the ball largely comes onto the bat in the Big Bash League. He was also used in the middle order as Australia assessed their options, but it felt like another square-peg, round-hole situation. In his favour, there will need to be another wicketkeeper in the World Cup squad and he could well travel as a utility player although it feels next year’s tournament in Australia could really be his time to shine.Ben McDermott
A stop-start international career has yet to get off the ground with his T20I strike rate still at under a run-a-ball. Like many, he is more comfortable in the top order but was used at No. 6 in the two matches he played against West Indies with scores of 2 and 7 before he picked up a quad injury. He then suffered another injury scare when he crashed through the boundary boards during the second ODI but has recovered to be available for this series and could have a chance to open in place of the absent Aaron Finch. Like Philippe, he could provide a back-up wicketkeeping option in a World Cup squad.Related

  • Turner hopes return to bowling will boost T20 World Cup chances

  • Bangladesh look to hurt Australia in rare T20I meeting

  • Matthew Wade returns to middle order as Australia 'roll through different scenarios'

Moises Henriques
Henriques earned his recall against India last year on the back of strong returns for the Sydney Sixers in the BBL, but against West Indies couldn’t make the most of his starts with four scores between 16 and 33. At times he also struggled to up the tempo with that 33 taking 29 balls in the third match. His leadership qualities and experience are valued around the squad but he may need a substantial score in this series to stay in contention. It has been surprising not to see him used with the ball.Ashton Turner
Having toured New Zealand without playing before returning home early for the birth of his child, he was a late addition to these two trips after a number of players withdrew having not been part of the original enlarged squad. However, it was still odd, given the middle-order role he plays in the BBL for Perth Scorchers, not to see him selected in the T20I side from the start. When he did get included midway through he made 24 and 6. It feels as though he needs a longer run this series to make a judgement. His offspin adds a useful extra string to the bow.Josh Philippe, Moises Henriques and Andrew Tye are among those hoping for more chances in Bangladesh•AFPDan Christian
It was a feel-good story when Christian was recalled to this squad amid the mass withdrawals after becoming a globe-trotting T20 star. The jury remains out whether the tale continues all the way to the World Cup. He had the perfect chance to finish a game in the first match against West Indies but became part of Australia’s hectic collapse. However, his unbeaten 22 off 14 balls in the fourth match gave a glimpse of what he can do when the innings had threatened to come off the rails. Australia won by four runs. He was only given five overs across four matches, the last of which went for 23.Andrew Tye
Tye is Australia’s fourth-leading wicket-taker in T20Is but has not had much opportunity since returning from an elbow injury. He played two matches against India last year, toured New Zealand without getting a game and then was finally brought in for the final match against West Indies last month. He stood up pretty well to a strong batting performance that threatened to storm over 200 before Tye’s three wickets pulled them back. He is likely to be jostling for one of the back-up pace bowling positions.Jason Behrendorff
The Perth Scorchers left-armer had two outings against West Indies with mixed results. He did not take a wicket in either game, but bowled a couple of good overs in Australia’s only victory and showed a few of the slower-ball variations he has been working to add to his white-ball game. In the last match, he was taken to by Evin Lewis when he was asked to bowl three overs inside the powerplay that went for 46 and included consecutive no-balls.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus